Represent Yourself, Bitch

I loved the series of RuPaul quotes in the June/July issue of MetroSource NY.  My favorite was his comment aimed at people who complain that drag queens are holding back the advancement of the gay community by misrepresenting gays; he says, “Bitch, we ain’t trying to represent you.  We’re just doing our thing…How about you represent yourself and we’ll represent ourselves?”  This is a great statement on the politics of drag, but more than that, it goes straight to the heart of larger issues of stereotyping vs. understanding.

There is an overwhelming tendency everywhere these days to sift through the masses by throwing everyone we meet and observe into some kind of pre-defined category.  Then, more often than not, we decide whether to like or dislike, include or exclude, accept or reject this person based on our understanding of the category we’ve just assigned them.  Not only do too many people lack a healthy willingness to revise their initial impressions of others, but for each successive revision they might afford someone, their evaluation is still based on shallow categorical definitions of what somebody can be.  And yet, contrary to linguistic convention, people are not types.  It’s time we moved beyond pre-definition.

One example that I find particularly salient considering the source of the quote that got me started on this subject in the first place is the issue of (bi)sexual identification.  Gayness is becoming increasingly accepted, but the bulk of the population perceives a clear polarization in straight versus gay.  Even those who recognize bisexuality as real and legitimate will frequently assume the term denotes a more-or-less clear 50/50 split and dismiss anyone who admits to new or evolving feelings of homo- or heterosexuality as a cunning opportunist (at worst) or clueless dilettante (at best) who will soon revert to their “original” straight or gay identity, perhaps leaving a couple broken hearts in the wake of their little game.  Doubtless there are those who fit such a description—but that doesn’t make it okay to dismiss a person as “one of them” before at least engaging that person in an open conversation about how they experience sexuality or otherwise making an individualized assessment rooted in a fine attention to nuance.

It is this kind of attention to the nuances and individuality of others that we need to develop in regards to all aspects of being and character.  In doing so, and thereby giving people a real chance to represent themselves in the way RuPaul defiantly suggests, we would also begin to cultivate a wider sympathy for, and appreciation of, others.  (And since some of the most obnoxious and anti-social behavior patterns are bred of continued misunderstanding, discrimination and exclusion, a greater number of people would likely develop sociable traits we can all appreciate more easily.)

What I’m talking about is something broader than learning acceptance in the way we’ve so far been pursuing it, along the lines of anti-discrimination and protected classes.  Racism, classism, sexism—no matter how many isms we come up with, those are limiting categories too.  Identifying disadvantaged groups has allowed us to make progress toward a more open and accepting outlook, but this tactic also encourages us to measure whether each person we meet fits into an ism-ized group as a first step to determining the degree of sympathy to afford that person.  Now it’s time to take what we’ve learned and move onto the next step.  We need only listen to RuPaul: represent yourself, and let others do the same.

Advertisements

2 Comments

Filed under Opinion & Essay

2 responses to “Represent Yourself, Bitch

  1. Cayman

    Although it’s not quite the same thing, this reminds me of this passage from Frederick Crews’ Postmodern Pooh, a send-up of various schools of criticism that you’d probably get a kick out of if you haven’t already:

    “CS morphed into its present radical state when Queer Studies came along and gave it a shove. I don’t mean Lesbian/Gay studies, which very politely says to the hegemonic order, “Say, there, if it’s all right with you, do you think you can make room in your prison for two more ‘marginalized identities’?” For one thing, queerness isn’t marginal. When you add in the kinkier heteros — fetishists, jock sniffers, Jesus freaks, doll collectors, day traders, spankers and spankees — queers are the moral majority for sure. And they don’t have a fixed “identity” either. Yo, look at me. I’ve been strictly a front-loader so far, just ask any of the ladies I hang with, but I’m not “a” straight, ’cause I reserve the right to switch-hit whenever I might get the yen. That’s queer freedom. Queer is just a shorthand way of saying, “Why not?”

  2. clarapy

    haha, thanks for sharing. :)

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s